News

Suggestions for Companies Embracing Liberal Agenda

“Why are companies trading a stable bottom line for leftist nonsense?” asks Linda Harvey in a column for WorldNetDaily.com.

Pointing to examples like Target’s agenda-driven restroom and fitting room policy and the Kellogg’s Company’s decision to discontinue advertising with Breitbart News, Harvey explains how corporate advocacy on social and political issues in the name of “tolerance” is actually taking big business down the road of “intolerance.”

Harvey writes:

In 2017, companies should take a completely different approach. Support Christian and conservative employees and customers – their values, principles and concerns.

Click here to read the five ways she believes companies can reverse course and become welcoming places for Christians and conservatives to do business again.

Then follow these links to see where Target and Kellogg’s stand on all the issues in our company database.

  • Spectrum
    • glenbo

      Spectrum:

      I followed your link to the News Blaster website and found
      some interesting points.
      For discussion purposes, I numbered these “points” and posed
      questions to each point.
      I am curious to see what rational, reasoned, informed,
      intelligent and logical answers you can provide for my questions.

      Here goes:

      1) >>”Homosexuals were granted anti-discrimination
      privileges in housing – no matter who owned the house and no matter what their
      religious views were.”<>”Homosexuals were granted anti-discrimination
      privileges in adoption of children.”<>”Homosexuals were given special privileges for
      medical insurance benefits for their partners.”<>”Homosexuals were given special privileges for
      hospital visitations with their partners.”<>”Homosexuals won the battle for enlistment in the
      military by pushing a policy called “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”<>”Then homosexuals won the battle for open
      enlistment in the military by overturning “Don’t Ask, Don’t Tell.”<>”Homosexuals won the battle for civil unions with
      their partners.”<>”Homosexuals won the battle with the Boy Scouts
      for openly homosexual scoutmasters and openly homosexual scouts.”<>”Homosexuals won the battle to overturn the
      Defense of Marriage Act in the Supreme Court.”<>”Homosexuals won the battle for same-sex
      marriage.”<>”Homosexuals used the threat of boycotts to win
      over corporate America, including the NBA and the NFL.”<>”Homosexuals won the battle to create “Gay Pride
      Month.”<>”Homosexuals won the battle to recruit kids to
      their lifestyle in the schools – even at the kindergarten level.”<<

      Q13a) What exactly is the mechanism of this “recruiting?”
      Q13b) How many kids became homosexual as a result of this so-called
      “recruiting?”

      I would like to add one more “point” to the above concerns
      about LGBT “battles” inclusiveness and LGBT rights that the News Blaster
      website neglected to include:

      14) Homosexuals won the battle to force Christian business
      owners to affirm and/or participate in their sinful marriages in violation of their
      beliefs.

      Q14a) How is making floral arangements and cakes religious
      conduct?
      Q14b) How does one’s beliefs become altered/violated if one simply
      sells a cake?
      Q14c) What harm would befall a Christian wedding caterer if
      he/she sold a cake/flowers, took photos, rented space etc. for a same-sex
      wedding ceremony?

      I look forward to logical, rational, reasoned, informed and
      intelligent responses from you Spectrum.

      Please answer these one by one and please take your time…no
      rush on my end…because the follow up questions to your responses are likely to
      get more difficult.

      • Spectrum

        I will not waste my valuable time in compiling a detailed response to your demands. And they ARE demands. You are so completely out of touch with what has and is happening in our society today ( and the world for that matter ) on these issues, that until you DO some proper research of your own, you do not have the information required to debate logically ( assuming I even feel like exhaustively debating yet another atheist / leftist like yourself – and God knows I’ve done so with plenty of them ).

        • Natureboi

          >” until you DO some proper research of your own, you do not have the information required to debate logically”<
          I accept your capitulation.
          If you are incapable of justifying foolish non-existent religious claims, it would bode best for you not to endorse them

          • Spectrum

            No, if you had paid attention I said I was tired of arguing previously with other atheists and perversion supporters. And I am. I am not on trial. I don’t answer to his list of demands or anyone else’s. Particularly when they’re posited from ignorance.

            If Glenbo and YOU weren’t so lazy, you could have found any number of articles that explains the Christian position on these issues. But would you be open minded about them, or would you resort to blocking your ears and scoffing ? I think we both know the answer to that, don’t we ?

          • Natureboi

            [[“If Glenbo and YOU weren’t so lazy, you could have found
            any number of articles that explains the Christian position on these issues.”]]

            At least you finally admit homosexuality isn’t a “society”
            problem, ant that is it ONLY a religion problem. I am well aware of the cake makers legal battles…incurred onto themselves by their own bad behavior.

            Perhaps if religion minded its own business, there wouldn’t
            be ANY problem

            Why don’t you just explain one thing…if possible…to prove
            that what you say is in any the least bit truthful:

            How has the sexual behaviors of others affected YOU
            personally?

          • Spectrum

            Religion needing to mind its own business ? We don’t force OUR BELIEFS on others – the gays are. We Christians offer the saving garce of the gospel to gays. You can either accept it or reject it – 99% of the time you reject it.

            “…How has the sexual behaviors of others affected YOU
            personally?…” Here’s some bedtime reading for you…

            http://www.cnsnews.com/commentary/eric-metaxas/how-does-gay-marriage-hurt-us-heres-how

            http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2990678/Christians-scared-admit-beliefs-fear-mocked-treated-like-bigots-say-equality-chiefs.html

            No-one being affected here of course ; http://www.americanthinker.com/blog/2016/04/video_sexual_predators_take_advantage_of_transgender_laws.html

            And this guy isn’t being affected at all ; http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-2914951/Suspended-sent-equality-training-Christian-magistrate-said-Adopted-child-needs-mum-dad-not-gay-parents.html

            No intimidation here whatsoever – http://www.wnd.com/2015/04/courts-conclude-faith-loses-to-gay-demands/

            Nothing to see here, folks – http://barbwire.com/2014/07/07/300-examples-read-understand-meant-term-homofascism/

            And this gay ‘couple’ ‘s poor hygiene habits don’t affect this airline employee or the airline itself one bit ; http://www.breitbart.com/texas/2015/05/15/gay-couple-sues-airlines-for-exposing-sex-toy-covered-in-fecal-matter/

            And these people wouldn’t have been influenced by the gay “marriage” decision in any way, I’m sure – http://www.dailymail.co.uk/news/article-3146479/Polygamous-Montana-trio-applies-wedding-license.html ( Slippery slope argument ? Nah. )

            Got lots more for you. But that’s for another time. Nighty night. Sweet dreams.

          • Natureboi

            You didn’t answer my question.
            How have YOU been affected?

          • Spectrum

            I don’t need to have been personally affected to understand that the gaystapo is affecting others in a majorly negative way, as I have shown you. Or do you think all those victims’ safety, their livelihoods and families welfare weren’t important ?

            It could well have been ME that was attacked and ruined as some of they were, had MY circumstances been different. Have you heard of the saying ; “There but for the grace of God go I ” ?

            I notice you have no comment on those victims, or the ORGANISED oppressive, disgraceful bully tactics their assailants used to force those good people to violate their religious consciences. Nothing to say about their rights to freedom of speech either.

          • Natureboi

            So the answer my question is NO.
            Homosexuals and homosexuality has NO affect on your life.
            Thank you!
            Perhaps if you mind your OWN business, you will continue to be unaffected.
            What others do with their genitals is NONE of your business.
            Stop being so creepy.

          • Spectrum

            No effect on my life…. yet. But if my circumstances changed, it easily could. Ask the victims of those gay entrapments that I linked to earlier if it has affected them, and you know what they’d reply !

            Look, I’m not unfamiliar with what gays go through. I’m not heartless and uncaring – quite the contrary. Bullying is wrong, and any kind of violence is abhorrent. The vast majority of Christians wouldn’t think of doing either towards them. The ones that might would be extremist fringe groups like the Westboro Church – and they certainly don’t represent mainstream Christianity anyway. We want what God wants – for homosexuals and sinners of ALL KINDS to believe in the gospel of Jesus Christ that saves by His grace – and repent ( i.e. turn away from ) their behaviours. God wants all His Creation to have everlasting life with Him. He will not tolerate sin, but He does offer a way out of it. That’s why He died on the cross – to take those sins on Himself, if only we would believe on and accept Him.

            Interesting that in ALL the examples in the links YOU PROVIDED, none – NOT ONE – mentioned the word “Christian”. Because there weren’t any involved in them. Just secular NON-Christians in society at large. Fancy that, eh ? This is in stark contrast to – as I said before – the incidents of gays attacking CHRISTIANS SPECIFICALLY. Targeting them !

            So if you want to do comparisons, then you need to match like with like. But you’ve shown that you can’t. Because Christians do not and certainly SHOULD NOT – hate gays or ANYONE ELSE. And if you know anything about us, you’d understand that.

            Ironic that you should tell me to “mind my own business”. Those shop owners tried to do just that, and were mercilessly harangued and victimised. Many crippled by fines, and some losing their business altogether. THAT’S bullying ! All they wanted was to have their freedom of religious conscience respected. A right that, by the way, is enshrined in the constitution. Most didn’t refuse on the grounds that the customers were homosexual. They offered to provide other services to them, as long as it didn’t require them giving implicit endorsement to gay “marriage”. Which is what baking a cake, printing a T-shirt, photographing the event, or renting a room e.t.c. would involve. So they weren’t discriminating, merely rightly expecting their conscience not to be violated.

            It’s the gay activist groups that encourage these types of provocative incidents in order to make an example of those who refuse to bow down to this fascism. We will not. Kim Davis wouldn’t, and she succeeded, becoming an inspiration for all of us who still value God’s moral standards.

          • Natureboi

            Wow. You use strong language. “mercilessly harangued and victimized,”
            “crippling fines,” “bullying,” “require them giving implicit endorsement to gay
            “marriage”,” (always in scare quotes) “provocative incidents,” “conscience
            not to be violated,” “fascism” and “entrapment.” Gay people do not have these
            intentions. You have been grossly misled and misinformed. And despite the fact
            the vast majority of Christians do see gay marriage as harmful to anyone, the
            vast majority of gay people take this religion based bigotry in stride realizing
            religion is a mere delusion of the religious. The tiny handful of “bullied”
            so-called “Christians” is not worthy of a blanket ban on LGBT rights. This is nothing
            but a church agenda desperately attempting to recruit “victims” of
            homosexuality and the expansion of LGBT rights and you have been duped by your
            own church into believing there is a problem when in fact there is not.

            [[“Christians do not and certainly SHOULD NOT – hate gays or
            ANYONE ELSE. And if you know anything about us, you’d understand that.”]]

            The comments on Christian blogs including your very own
            speak otherwise.

            [[“ALL the examples in the links YOU PROVIDED, none – NOT
            ONE – mentioned the word “Christian”. Because there weren’t any
            involved in them. Just secular NON-Christians in society at large.”]]

            Where do you think hatred for LGBT people comes from in the
            first place? Who in society speaks out viciously against LGBT people? The
            church. Even your very words contain nothing but animus for innocent,
            hardworking, honest, taxpaying people YOU ADMIT have done NO harm to you, yet
            the best words you can muster up are vile and vitriolic. Hatred for LGBT people
            comes from RELIGION and you prove this with every word you write. Perhaps if I
            should show you Muslim persecution of gays, you might re-think your religion
            based bigotry.

            The strong words you used do NOT reflect LGBT people. I am
            convinced you do not know a single LGBT person and it’s obvious why. I am
            related to and friends with many and NONE possess the qualities you described
            with your strong words above. NONE.

            [[“We want what God wants “]]

            Until your god reveals himself as being nothing but a
            figment of your imagination, your religion has no authority amongst society at
            large. If “Christians” can’t do business with LGBT people, they should change
            their business format. Problem solved, and nobody faces discrimination. When
            you throw religion into the public sphere authoritatively, you violate
            boundaries.

            Kim Davis wasn’t “bullied,” SHE was the bully by sticking
            her bigoted nose where it never belonged under the phony pretense of “answering
            to a higher authority.” She deserved what she got for her bigoted intolerance
            based on irrational so-called “belief.” Kim needs to take her “problem” up with
            her imaginary god or whatever source that poisoned her mind to such an absurd
            degree.

            The so-called business owner “victims” didn’t mind their
            business. “You want cake/flowers for what? Oh no, no cake for YOU people!” That’s
            bigotry by definition of the word. It’s not anyone’s business who one chooses
            to marry. They overstepped boundaries. No harm would have befallen them if they
            sold the damn cake and flowers.

            Your logic is as follows: ‘If I hate blacks, and I refuse to
            serve them ONLY because they are black, and the anti-discrimination police hold
            me accountable for violating anti-discrimination laws, I am the bullied harassed
            victim.’ Your reasoning and logic in regards to these business owners is
            childishly vacuous.

            Selling props for events is not “endorsing” anything. It
            doesn’t alter “beliefs” or harm one’s “conscience.” All of this alleged harm is
            non-existent and imaginary. Selling props for events is not religious conduct. The
            legal troubles that befell these so-called “Christians” incurred as a result of
            them breaking the law. The massive $184,000 penalty imposed on Sweetcakes
            owners Aaron and Melissa Klein was as a result of Aaron posting the lesbian
            couple’s address and private contact information on Facebook resulting in death
            threats putting their children at risk of being removed from their custody.
            However, this fine was paid off by crowd funding and then some.

            Nobody “lost their business.” This is a fabricated lie. They
            intentionally closed down their public operations in order to either continue
            to operate privately to avoid compliance with anti-discrimination laws, or
            willingly closed in order to avoid serving gay customers as required by law. None
            of these so-called “Christian” business owners were ever “forced” to do
            anything they didn’t willingly choose to do.

            The “problem” isn’t gay people simply wanting marriage
            equality…the problem is religion’s intolerance of homosexuality for no rational
            reason. If your “conscience” prevents you from loving your neighbors and
            treating them equally as Jesus taught, take it up with your non-existent
            hateful imaginary god…because that is where the problem lies… NOT with gay people
            or gay marriage. You can attempt to demonize LGBT people all you want…all you
            are accomplishing is demonstrating how irrational and intolerant religion is
            and religious people are.

            The solution isn’t blaming and demonizing gay people and self-martyrization,
            the solution is to get out of the marriage business if your hate is stronger
            than your love and your faith is weaker than your compassion.

            But let me ask you this:

            If the “Christian” business owners sold the cake/flowers to
            the gay couples in compliance with the law, what harm would have befallen them?

            Censorship is not debate.
            Censorship is denial of free speech.

          • Spectrum

            This latest reply of yours explains why I am tired of debating with people like you. You just don’t get it. I’ve already gone further with this discussion than I intended to. Believe what you want. You’ll discover the truth when you – and all of us – leave this life. And from the ever more decadent state of society today, that time won’t be far off.

          • Natureboi

            [[“You just don’t get it.”]]

            Oh, my dear friend but I do.

            Let me conclude our conversation with the following and then
            let’s just get on with our lives.
            I will apologize in advance if you feel I am personally attacking
            you. I am not. I am attacking your flawed, irrational and corrupted ideology.
            Here goes:

            You believe in a god that cannot be proven to exist.

            I do not.

            You believe your imaginary non-existent god gives you
            permission to legally practice discrimination, to control the lives, bodies, and
            legal contracts of total strangers who will never impact your live.

            I say you do not have this imagined permission.

            Since your non-existing imaginary god is non-acting, you support
            relying on a secular based government to impose your religion on strangers you
            will never meet.

            I say you cross a line when you do this.

            Christians largely voted into power the least qualified,
            most hated, most corrupt, most immoral and most disgusting presidential
            candidate in US history and did so only for selfish, intrusive, invasive and
            totally unnecessary reasons…to be able to legally practice discrimination, to take
            control over the lives and bodies of women they will never know and to take
            ownership of legal (marriage) contracts of total strangers who will never
            impact anyone’s life because Christians have been convinced their imaginary un-acting
            god wants them to. The only reason Christians support this childish, egotistical,
            greedy wealth-obsessed buffoon coming into power is because they want to see
            Obama’s LGBT rights orders eradicated and alter control of the Supreme Court in
            order to deny women abortion rights and to block all LGBT rights in the future…all
            selfish, intrusive, invasive and unnecessary boundary violating reasons that
            are NONE of anyone’s business and don’t have any effect on anyone’s life other
            than oppressing women seeking abortion and oppressing LGBT people.

            The selfishness of Christians under the irrational,
            unnecessary, illogical, harmful, counter-productive and meaningless demands of
            their imagined divine authority figure have– as mindless drones– turned a docile America– in which by the way all
            Christians (who aren’t gay-hating law breaking bigots) were doing just fine–
            into an oppressive, totalitarian, fascist, nationalistic and elitist regime
            that will harm millions of its own innocent and innocuous taxpaying citizens–
            but your life and the lives of all Christians will be virtually unchanged and
            certainly not improved whatsoever, unless seeing LGBT people being hurt somehow
            pleases you.

            You, my dear friend are the one who doesn’t get it.

            Cheers, mate.

          • Spectrum
          • Natureboi

            Number of girls assaulted by transgenders going into women’s rest rooms since the first transgender inclusion policy was put in place in 1997:

            ZERO.

            http://equalitymatters.org/factcheck/201403200001

          • Spectrum
          • Natureboi

            [[“I’ll take factual incidents over downplaying and spin from vested interest groups like Equality Matters.”]]

            Your links to hysteria invoking websites contradict your very own words.

            Since you so accurately (and so quickly) “fact checked” the equality matters link and found the stories to be “fake news,” perhaps your extensive research talents can debunk the Cambridge Massachusetts “fake news” story…that there have been ZERO incidents since allowing transgender inclusion for TWENTY YEARS.

            Please demonstrate the falseness of this report where Cambridge Police Superintendent reported “No Incidents” Of Transgender Protections Being Abused.

          • Spectrum

            Well big deal if there hasn’t been any in Cambridge – yet. They can count themselves lucky then. Plenty happening in other places though. Did you watch the criminals identified in that video ? Please explain why THEY did what they did.

          • Natureboi

            [[“Well big deal if there hasn’t been any in Cambridge –
            yet.”]]
            At least finally you admit transgender inclusion policies don’t
            created predation crimes.

            What you failed to document and/or “research” is a
            comparative to predatory crimes committed BEFORE such policies were put in place
            as opposed to AFTER. You won’t.

            What you will find as evidenced in my well researched link
            you so readily dismissed as “fake news” is there have been NO attacks on women
            by true transgenders ANYWHERE in the 15 jurisdictions in the link.

            What you fail to understand is there is a difference between
            crossdressing and gender dysphoria.

            [[“Please explain why THEY did what they did”]]

            Please don’t presume I understand the operation the minds of
            predators.

            Sickos will do their sick $hit, inclusion policy or not. And
            you also failed to do a comparative research on attacks occurring outside of
            restrooms by non-crossdressing women. You are in far more danger going to your
            car alone in a parking lot after dark than in a brightly lit restroom. What you
            seem incapable of understanding is that true transgenders are not sexual
            predators. There is a difference. But you have been taught by your church to
            demonize all LGBT. If you actually knew an LGBT person as I do, you would
            realize your church is wrong.

            No doubt there will and have been men dressing up as women in
            order to commit attacks, but this is not what being transgender equates to as
            your church has so successfully misinformed you as being the reality of transgenders.

            Your logic equates to:

            A burglar was caught wearing a black hat and black
            sweatshirt…therefore everyone who wears a black hat and black sweatshirt is a
            burglar.

        • glenbo

          Spectrum:
          You said”

          >”You are so completely out of touch with what has
          and is happening in our society today”<

          Wrong. Sir, you have grossly misjudged me. And your defense
          to avoid questions (that will reveal ONLY hate-driven bigotry)…that I am
          "uninformed" is laughable and absurd. I am aware of the advances in
          LGBT equality…NONE of which has affected you. I am aware of Barronelle
          Stuztman, Melissa Klein, and the biggest phony so-called “Christian” Jack
          Phillips who agreed to make a wedding cake for a couple he knew were
          adulterous. Oh, but you are so wrong,
          sir. I AM indeed all too well informed. No harm would have befallen these business
          owners if they just sold the damn cake and/or flowers. No “harm” has come to
          society since same-sex marriage became legal, never mind the last 12 years it has
          been legal in Massachusetts unless you can demonstrate otherwise.

          I already know the answers to all these questions. I worded
          them in a way to reveal needless, unjustifiable religious based bigotry.
          Answering any of these questions honestly will reveal the selfish self-entitled
          mentality of so-called "Christians," who aren't true Christians if
          they abuse their religion in order to practice bigotry and discrimination
          against an entire social demographic group who have done nothing wrong to
          deserve it and for irrational reasons while actually accomplishing nothing
          except hardship for LGBT people.

          The only thing that is “happening in society” is expanding
          rights to a historically oppressed demographic group. This “happening” has no
          effect on you, Christians or society at large as answering any of my questions
          honestly will clearly reveal.

          Many of these questions can ONLY be answered by saying
          "religious conscience," such as the landlord/tenant question and the
          cake maker's corrupt prejudice. But the follow up questions reveal nothing but
          sinister intent and blatant prejudice on behalf of so-called
          "Christians" and no positive redeemable purpose and/or outcome comes
          of it and you know this.

          Evicting/firing someone only because they are gay is immoral
          in so many ways it’s pathetic.

          It is intrusive, invasive, disrespectful, harmful,
          accomplishes nothing but hardship and frankly is nobody’s business. Anyone who
          cannot treat gay people with equality based on their so-called religious “conscience”
          subscribes to a corrupt and immoral ideology. But since sexual orientation isn’t
          a protected class, I can legally fire or evict YOU and your children only for
          being heterosexual and for no other reason. Were you aware of this? Would you
          accept this? Of course not. Yet you hypocritically believe you should be
          allowed to do so to homosexuals for no rational reason or purpose other than to
          be punitive. Jesus NEVER taught to do this.

          I don't blame you for refusing to even attempt to back up
          these ridiculous hate-filled bigoted "points" you linked us to that
          have NO effect on your life or society at large. And I don't blame you at all
          for not wanting to make a fool of yourself and demonstrate how small-minded
          your linked anti-gay “points” are ultimately by attempting to answer because
          that’s all you will be able to accomplish.

          • Spectrum

            “…I already know the answers to all these questions. I worded
            them in a way to reveal needless, unjustifiable religious based bigotry….”.

            Of course you did. That’s why I’m not going to take your bait.

            “….refusing to even attempt to back up
            these ridiculous hate-filled bigoted “points” you linked us to that
            have NO effect on your life or society at large….”.

            NO EFFECT on society at large, eh ? Who is really the bigot here ?

            Goodbye.

          • Natureboi

            [[“NO EFFECT on society at large, eh ?”]]
            What effect?
            How have you been affected?
            Examples, please?

          • glenbo

            >”I’m not going to take your bait and waste my time”<

            Of course you won't. That's because you cannot justify needless discrimination and anti-gay bigotry without admitting it is religion caused and religion perpetuated.
            It is ONLY a religion "problem."
            The ONLY reason gays are marginalized is because of religion generated misinformation and religion generated hate.
            And your refusing to "waste your time" is because you cannot conjure up a single, logical, rational reason why gays should be rejected and how society is "harmed" without cowardly hiding behind your non-existent imaginary hate-filled god.
            Your needless hate and bigotry towards homosexuals is purely religion based, and your religion is nothing but an empty sack.

  • glenbo

    Exactly what is the “liberal agenda?”

    • Spectrum

      To even be asking that question demonstrates your ignorance of the subject. Or perhaps you know a lot more about it than you’re making out just so you can provoke and be mischievous, wasting people’s time in the process. I think I recall having encountered you on another website discussion board. You haven’t learned anything since then have you ?

      • Natureboi

        >”To even be asking that question demonstrates your ignorance of the subject.”<
        To avoid positing a reasoned, rational and logical response and instead attacking my character is a cowardly cop-out.

        • Spectrum

          It wasn’t an attack on his character. He simply hasn’t done sufficient research to arm himself with knowledge of the subject.

          Just ONE example – he asked ; “…What makes the fact that the tenants/employees are gay any of the renter’s/employer’s business…”?

          If he had been following the narrative on this that has been going for at least the last five years, he would know why. Do you ?

          • Natureboi

            [[“What makes the fact that the tenants/employees are gay any of the renter’s/employer’s business…”?”]]
            I would assume your response would be “religion makes the sexual orientation my business.”
            I say wrong. The sexual orientation is NOT anyone’s business. And religion doesn’t give you the right to tell others what they may or may not do. Religion doesn’t give you the right to treat some people with inequality. It is arrogant to assume so.

          • Spectrum

            Yeah yeah. Go bore someone else. I’m taking a break from debating with those who won’t accept that there is a Creator God who defines standards of righteousness and morality. Who set the terms for human emotional and sexual interaction and restricted it to a relationship between a man and a woman. You reject God and thus prefer to justify yourself in your sin rather than submit to His will. That’s the same rebellious spirit that caused Man’s fall from grace to begin with.

            It won’t be of any use to you if I emphasise that Christians don’t hate the person, we hate the act – because you’ve been too brainwashed by the gay activist propaganda to see otherwise.

          • Natureboi

            [[“If Glenbo and YOU weren’t so lazy, you could have found
            any number of articles that explains the Christian position on these issues.”]]

            At least you finally admit homosexuality isn’t a “society”
            problem, ant that is it ONLY a religion problem.

            Perhaps if religion minded its own business, there wouldn’t
            be ANY problem

            Why don’t you just explain one thing…if possible…to prove
            that what you say is in any the least bit truthful:

            How has the sexual behaviors of others affected YOU
            personally?

      • glenbo

        Spectrum:
        You said:

        >”To even be asking that question demonstrates your ignorance of the subject.”<

        How is endorsing equality a bad thing?